Author: Mark Rawlings
Date: 05:04:10 09/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
Any new record for longest mate in these? Thanks, Mark On September 08, 2002 at 01:21:08, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >Total size of all 3+3 and 4+2 pawnless TBs is ~235Gb. Part of them are already >on your site; look into "TB/six" and "TB/upload" directories. > >Thanks, >Eugene > >On September 06, 2002 at 21:22:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 06, 2002 at 18:48:01, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >> >>>Actually, I generated all 3+3 and 4+2 pawnless tables but two; twose last two >>>are being generated right now. >>> >>>After that I'll start 6-men with pawns. >>> >>>I just cannot transfer those tables to your site. Probably I should just send >>>you disk drive by mail... Can you find XP computer with 1394 connector for the >>>external disk? >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Eugene >> >>You are talking about IEEE 1394 firewire? Yes, we have such a box. We >>use a firewire disk to store "images" of our windows 2000 stuff so that >>if something goes wrong, we can push the whole kit and kaboodle back out >>to the machine... >> >>But I must ask... how big a firewire drive are you going to send? IE how >>big is my ftp machine going to have to be? :) >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>>On September 06, 2002 at 18:38:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On September 06, 2002 at 16:27:22, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >>>> >>>>>On September 06, 2002 at 16:14:19, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>What is the estimated size [of kppkpp]? >>>>> >>>>>>at least 1000 gigabytes (a terabyte) >>>>> >>>>>How do you estimate this? >>>>> >>>>>My simple estimation (ignoring the ep problem, but it should not make a bigger >>>>>factor) would be: >>>>> >>>>>3612 * 48 *47 / 2 * 46 * 45 / 2 >>>>> >>>>>which would make 4 Gb positions, compressed obviously less. Even 64^6 (taking no >>>>>symmetry into account) is "only" 64 gigabytes. >>>>> >>>>>Regards, >>>>>Dieter >>>> >>>> >>>>The threes/fours/fives are 7.5 gigs already. But even more importantly, >>>>the 6's are going to blow a byte for scores... So they are going to be >>>>twice the size to boot. >>>> >>>>I already have some compressed 6 piece tables that are > 2.0 gigabytes. We >>>>have almost 100 gigs with no pawns done yet, and not all of 3 vs 3 are >>>>done yet... much less 4 vs 2, 1 vs 5 and then those pawns... >>>> >>>>IMHO a terabyte is a lower bound... not upper.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.