Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 15:20:28 09/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2002 at 15:17:31, Angrim wrote: >In my experience, making small optimizations to the indexing scheme >which save 1/48th here and 1/64 there result in the data being >less compressable to the point where no saving in disk space were >gained. My indexing method results in an average 10% of the index >space being for illegal or redundant positions, but compresses >very well. I guess our goals differ. with win/draw/loss there is no big diff for optimization in fact. if you lose entries that's great of course. >Since my tablebase collection has roughly 3/4 TB positions in it, >I have given up on storing the indices in RAM, except for the >tables with less than 5 pieces. I just rely on the OS to cache >recently accessed sections of the indices. > >Angrim >ps. primitif should be spelled primitive
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.