Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 17:09:55 09/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2002 at 16:45:57, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>First the game:
>
>[White "Ivanchuk,V"]
>[Black "Kasparov,G"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[WhiteElo "2711"]
>[BlackElo "2838"]
>[EventDate "2002.09.08"]
>[ECO "B90"]
>
>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Rg1 g6 7. g4 Bg7 8.
>Be3 Nc6 9. f3 e5 10. Nxc6 bxc6 11. Qd2 Be6 12. O-O-O Bf8 13. Na4 h5 14. h3
>Nd7 15. Qc3 hxg4 16. hxg4 d5 17. Qxc6 d4 18. Bd2 Rc8 19. Qb7 Rb8 20. Qxa6
>Ra8 21. Qb5 Bxa2 22. Bc4 Bxc4 23. Qxc4 Qf6 24. g5 Qd6 25. Kb1 Rh3 26. Rgf1
>Be7 27. b3 Qa3 28. Bc1 Qb4 29. Qxb4 Bxb4 30. f4 Rh4 31. Rh1 Rxh1 32. Rxh1
>Ke7 33. f5 Ra6 34. Rh7 Nc5 35. Bd2 Rxa4 36. fxg6 Bxd2 37. Rxf7+ Ke6 38.
>Rf6+ Ke7 39. bxa4 Nxe4 40. Rf5 {this last move may not be correct} 1-0
>
>Ivanchuk,V - Kasparov,G
>
>[D]8/4kp1R/r5p1/2n1pPP1/Nb1pP3/1P6/2P5/1KB5 w - - 0 1
>
>Ivanchuk played strong now Bd2! and win after Rxa4 fxg6!!
>
>Fritz 7 see this nice move not. Which program play this move?
>
>Ivanchuk,V - Kasparov,G
>8/4kp1R/r5p1/2n1pPP1/Nb1pP3/1P6/2P5/1KB5 w - - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Fritz 7.oo8:
>
>35.Sxc5 Lxc5 36.Ld2 gxf5 37.exf5 Kf8 38.c3 d3 39.b4 Lf2 40.Th6 Tb6 41.Txb6 Lxb6
>42.c4
>± (1.13) Tiefe: 14/32 00:00:34 11015kN
>35.Sxc5 Lxc5 36.Ld2 gxf5 37.exf5 Kf8 38.c3 Tc6 39.Th4 Lb6 40.c4 Lc5 41.Te4 Tb6
>± (1.19) Tiefe: 15/33 00:01:32 29456kN
>35.Sxc5 Lxc5 36.Ld2 gxf5 37.exf5 Kf8 38.Th4 Ke7 39.c3 d3 40.Tg4 Ta8 41.Tg3 Td8
>42.g6
>± (1.28) Tiefe: 16/34 00:03:29 65014kN
>
>(Nemeth, Stuttgart 09.09.2002)
>
>
>Judit Polgar won against Kasparov too!!
Crafty SE 17.16 plays this move!
White(1): 8/4kp1R/r5p1/2n1pPP1/Nb1pP3/1P6/2P5/1KB5 w - - 0 1
White(1): go
end-game phase
clearing hash tables
time surplus 0.00 time limit 100:00 (100:00)
nss depth time score variation (1)
starting thread 1
2-> 0.00 1.35 1. Nxc5 Bxc5 2. fxg6 Rxg6
3 0.00 1.35 1. Nxc5 Bxc5 2. fxg6 Rxg6
3-> 0.01 1.35 1. Nxc5 Bxc5 2. fxg6 Rxg6
4 0.01 1.51 1. Nxc5 Bxc5 2. fxg6 Rxg6 3. Kb2
4-> 0.01 1.51 1. Nxc5 Bxc5 2. fxg6 Rxg6 3. Kb2
5 0.03 1.28 1. Nxc5 Bxc5 2. fxg6 Rxg6 3. Kb2 Bb4
5 0.04 1.31 1. f6+ Ke6 2. Nxc5+ Bxc5 3. Bd2 Ba3
4. b4 Ra4
5-> 0.04 1.31 1. f6+ Ke6 2. Nxc5+ Bxc5 3. Bd2 Ba3
4. b4 Ra4
6 0.04 1.31 1. f6+ Ke6 2. Nxc5+ Bxc5 3. Bd2 Ba3
4. b4 Ra4
6 0.06 1.43 1. Nxc5 Bxc5 2. fxg6 Rxg6 3. Bd2 Ra6
4. Kc1
(4) 6-> 0.09 1.43 1. Nxc5 Bxc5 2. fxg6 Rxg6 3. Bd2 Ra6
4. Kc1
(3) 7 0.09 1.41 1. Nxc5 Bxc5 2. fxg6 Rxg6 3. Bd2 Ra6
4. b4 Rb6
7 0.14 1.54 1. Bd2 Bxd2 2. Nxc5 Rb6 3. Nd3 gxf5
4. Nxe5 fxe4 5. Rxf7+
7-> 0.15 1.54 1. Bd2 Bxd2 2. Nxc5 Rb6 3. Nd3 gxf5
4. Nxe5 fxe4 5. Rxf7+
8 0.22 1.47 1. Bd2 Rxa4 2. bxa4 Bxd2 3. fxg6 Kf8
4. Rxf7+ Ke8 5. Rf5 Nxa4 6. Rxe5+
(2) 8-> 0.33 1.47 1. Bd2 Rxa4 2. bxa4 Bxd2 3. fxg6 Kf8
4. Rxf7+ Ke8 5. Rf5 Nxa4 6. Rxe5+
9 0.39 1.47 1. Bd2 Rxa4 2. bxa4 Bxd2 3. fxg6 Kf8
4. Rxf7+ Ke8 5. Rf5 Nxa4 6. Rxe5+
(2) 9-> 0.51 1.47 1. Bd2 Rxa4 2. bxa4 Bxd2 3. fxg6 Kf8
4. Rxf7+ Ke8 5. Rf5 Nxa4 6. Rxe5+
10 0.59 -- 1. Bd2
10 0.75 1.55 1. Bd2 Rxa4 2. bxa4 Bxd2 3. fxg6 Kf8
4. Rxf7+ Kg8 5. Re7 Kf8 6. Rxe5 Nxa4
(3) 10-> 1.00 1.55 1. Bd2 Rxa4 2. bxa4 Bxd2 3. fxg6 Kf8
4. Rxf7+ Kg8 5. Re7 Kf8 6. Rxe5 Nxa4
11 1.15 -- 1. Bd2
(2) 11 2.25 1.69 1. Bd2 Bxd2 2. Nxc5 Rb6 3. Nd3 Bf4
4. Nxf4 exf4 5. Kb2 f3 6. fxg6 Rxg6
11-> 2.76 1.69 1. Bd2 Bxd2 2. Nxc5 Rb6 3. Nd3 Bf4
4. Nxf4 exf4 5. Kb2 f3 6. fxg6 Rxg6
12 4.00 1.83 1. Bd2 Bxd2 2. Nxc5 Rb6 3. Nd3 gxf5
4. exf5 Bxg5 5. Nxe5 Rf6 6. Kb2 Be3
7. Ng6+ Kd6
(2) 12-> 5.40 1.83 1. Bd2 Bxd2 2. Nxc5 Rb6 3. Nd3 gxf5
4. exf5 Bxg5 5. Nxe5 Rf6 6. Kb2 Be3
7. Ng6+ Kd6
13 10.25 1.77 1. Bd2 Bxd2 2. Nxc5 Rb6 3. Nd3 Bc3
4. Kc1 Ra6 5. f6+ Kd6 6. Kd1 Ra1+ 7.
Ke2 Ra2 8. Rxf7 Rxc2+ 9. Kf3
13-> 19.53 1.77 1. Bd2 Bxd2 2. Nxc5 Rb6 3. Nd3 Bc3
4. Kc1 Ra6 5. f6+ Kd6 6. Kd1 Ra1+ 7.
Ke2 Ra2 8. Rxf7 Rxc2+ 9. Kf3
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.