Author: martin fierz
Date: 02:40:56 09/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2002 at 05:19:17, Dave Gomboc wrote: >If you can't see the belittlement in there, then you have less intellect then I >give you credit for. wow, thank you! >I took the time to look at it over a week before I posted here about it. Again, >the state of the code is irrelevant. There is documentation of the database >format provided -- so you don't have to even use that code to access the >databases. You can write your own access code. give me ONE good reason to post the database but not the access code to it. just ONE. >I emailed the position to Jonathan and asked him if Chinook would play the right >move -- he replied that it did. I assume that the search was cold (no filled >hash from previous searches). So I guess it's not that bad a program. <shrug> that kind of test is plain stupid. cake will avoid the errors chinook made in the match against lafferty on the 2-second level. it means *nothing*. aloha martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.