Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Checkers: Las Vegas and Chinook

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 03:42:40 09/10/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 10, 2002 at 06:10:52, martin fierz wrote:

>BTW, two more things about this:
>1. "the position" is very unspecific. i seriously doubt you managed to find the
>position where cake lost the game.
>2. "chinook would play the right move" is also very unspecific. how long does it
>take to find "the right move"? what kind of score does it have? are you sure it
>doesn't switch back to the wrong move? the only thing which would convince me
>was a search log...
>
>aloha
>  martin

Is it that you think I'm an idiot and couldn't be bothered to look it up?  The
position I asked about is the position that on Nemesis's website says "and here
this move loses, while this other move draws" (or words to that effect).  And
there's a little applet that lets you play through the game, so it's tough to
get it wrong.  If that's not the correct position, then someone who's obviously
an expert on the subject has it written down on their website wrong.  Mind you,
if that's the case, I'm not going to snivel and whine about it publicly, even
though it was posted recently, as compared to years ago.

I didn't ask for a search log.  I assume that if it was fluctuating he would
have mentioned it ("it changes its mind often") or some such.

I find that my responses are getting pretty snarky.  I guess I'd better get some
sleep.  Perhaps I won't be quite so rude tomorrow.

Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.