Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:35:32 09/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2002 at 05:55:25, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 10, 2002 at 05:14:07, martin fierz wrote: > >>>believe in your god. i have mine. > >>i don't believe in god. you didnt answer the simple question i asked, but your >>wild ramblings are an answer in themselves :-) > >which question. your "question" has the definition that you have a god >named RANDOM FLUCTUATION or whatever. > >in my world such a god is not existing. > >you believe when you play 288 games that you can find out the truth. >IMO you could play 1000 or 4000 games without finding out. >your "random fluctuation"-(god) is not showing you the facts, it is hiding >you the main facts. > >that there is a dynmic world. and changes lead to changes. > >and you can measure this quality. >read : pirsig, charon, peat, > >there is decribed what i mean. > > >of course you believe in random is a god. >only that you call your god "no god". > >but you believe in your "non-god". > >otherwise you would not play out 288 games , or ? > > >what a weak god. > > >believing in statistics, is beliving in god. the god of statistic, >but random and chance can be manipulated by subjects. >life - forms manipulate chances of events. > >and your god has no idea why and when. I believe also in statistics. statictics does not tell me that watching games is not important. Statistics also does not tell me that playing 288 games has no meaning. If the new version can beat the old version it is not enough and tests may be needed also against other programs but if it is losing then it means that there is a problem and you need to look in the games to find it. > >you try to find out later by doing out events. 288 times. >but you don't get the reason what is going on. It is wrong because Martin also looked in the games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.