Author: Chessfun
Date: 11:07:57 09/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2002 at 12:45:21, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 10, 2002 at 11:58:34, Chessfun wrote: > >>Oh, and you never played any games after the 1st Fritz 7 white Date >>"2002.09.03"]K6-400"] or after [Event "40/120, Athlon C-1200"] >>[Date "2002.09.03"]. Till the next Fritz 7 white?. Your games are a joke and >>always presented with incomplete data. > >i have no idea what you are talking about. >the data comes from the chess programs. >what is incomplete ?? >i see no incomplete data. Must have gone over your head....skip it. >>Er, not if you change who is master.......doh. > >why should i. >>I think most foreigners understood it perfectly well. > >the sense of a dialogue is that both understand it. >i am not interested in MOST foreigners. it's impolite to talk >in slang that only natives understand. You replied to the first paragraph so apparently you got it only too well. What was the slang you didn't get? doh?....http://www.snpp.com/ Check there, it may help. >>Er, excuse please. Were you not the one whom posted to my post?, I may have >>posted in a thread you started but not to you. > >i posted about computerchess. you talked about coffee. >this is of course outing your intention. I actually wrote about God, the coffee was secondary ;-) >>My unbiased comments are always about results. As you and many others are well >>aware I beta test for Rebel NOT for Chessbase. > >so why do you need to defend chessbase in a thread about rebel xp games, >where the company you defend was not mentioned at all ? The company have no need to be mentioned if you are using one of their products. Do I need to say Microsoft when commenting on Windows. >>Posting a PGN naturally isn't an attack on Chessbase. > > >thank you. >so why do you defend chessbase against PGN games ???? Never defended anyone except myself from your attack. Commented upon your bias against Chessbase and was curious as to what they could have done to you to make you so bitter?. >>I myself have posted many, >>including my latest rating list showing that from my data Chessbase no longer >>has the strongest program. However whenever you present data it's always >>incomplete leaving many to question your results, your methods, your bias. > >what is incomplete in the pgn games i posted. The PGN's you choose not to post. >what is the problem in my methods ? The PGN's you choose not to post. >what is the bias in my statements i posted ? No bias....simple fact. The PGN's you choose not to post....;-) >that rebel is DOS ? that is has no tablebases ? or that it uses >only 60 MB hash ? Are any of those a bias....or simply program parameters. When you say something...try for it to be logical. >looks very biased - indeed. > >>Test against anything you choose, it's your time to waste. >i can give this compliment only back to you sarah. You started with it, did you not?. >the facts are that i posted pgn data. did not mention chessbase. >and you come with coffee and prejudices. No the fact's are you choose to talk about me, when I had said nothing about either the way you do things nor your prejudices. >thats your way of doing computerchess. >and your way of beeing unbiased. Again, it's self-evident that I post results without bias. The same cannot be said for you. Sarah.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.