Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 13:52:49 09/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2002 at 14:07:57, Chessfun wrote: >The company have no need to be mentioned if you are using one of their products. >Do I need to say Microsoft when commenting on Windows. since there is almost only ONE company left, it will be difficult to find an opponent in the future that will bring us not into you biased attack fever. maybe i could play against krabat on atari ST. >The PGN's you choose not to post. ?? there are no PGN i did not post. between style 51 and 56 i changed parameters significant way to find out WHICH part of the styling is in charge for the good results. this is the way it works. >The PGN's you choose not to post. i don't understand you. why should i post the results of the styles that do not make it ? the idea behind styling is to chose a good style out of many bad efforts. why posting the ones that did not make it ?? those are garbage. they have only one goal to find out about the program. >No bias....simple fact. >The PGN's you choose not to post....;-) ?? There are no pgn's i did not post. the pgn's i posted are the amount of games i had played till that day with those styles. if you believe there are more games than your believe is wrong. thats your religion. >Are any of those a bias....or simply program parameters. >When you say something...try for it to be logical. you complained that i do post biased information. so which one was biased ? you say the information i did not posted was biased ? you say the games i did not post were your problem ? I guess you have a serious problem. you speculate about things that don't exist other than in your mind, you see things that exist only in your imagination. that is not computerchess, that is neurotical. its a desease. >Again, it's self-evident that I post results without bias. The same cannot be >said for you. no. when you believe that somebody is hiding something, when he posts something, this is indeed biased. the bias exists in your mind. its a kind of filter that stops you from seeing the truth. instead you see what you believe. if i would have more games i would post them. for you. that you can consider about even more games that i do not post. this way you can insult anybody anytime. you can e.g. complain about the ssdf-guys playing out 4000 games, and only posting the 200 games where fritz wins and draws and throwing those in the garbage where fritz loses. and put the comment under thoralfs comment: ">The PGN's you choose not to post....;-)" this makes the desease obvious. you present your prejudice instead of presenting any data that subscribes your weird ideas. i cannot defend against something that exists only in your mind of course. you can create 10 times more crimes in your mind than i could fullfill in reality in the same time :-))) Typical reaction for somebody doing computerchess. instead of talking about the topic you talk about something that is NOT posted and is an outing of your own prejudices. this way YOU would do it, he ?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.