Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:32:08 09/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2002 at 16:52:49, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 10, 2002 at 14:07:57, Chessfun wrote: >>The company have no need to be mentioned if you are using one of their products. >>Do I need to say Microsoft when commenting on Windows. > >since there is almost only ONE company left, it will be difficult >to find an opponent in the future that will bring us not into you biased >attack fever. > >maybe i could play against krabat on atari ST. > >>The PGN's you choose not to post. > >?? > >there are no PGN i did not post. >between style 51 and 56 i changed parameters significant way to find >out WHICH part of the styling is in charge for the good results. >this is the way it works. > >>The PGN's you choose not to post. > >i don't understand you. why should i post the results of the styles >that do not make it ? The point is that not posting the results of styles that do not make it give less information. The point is that people can give wrong impression by the following steps: 1)Trying many styles. 2)Choosing the style that perform the best based on results that does not have to be the best style because of statistical error. 3)posting only the result of the style that made the best result. I am sure that you do not try to do it on purpose and you look at the games and not only in the results but it is still possible that you may get wrong impression because few games with good results may not expose an important weakness. Sarah probably means to say that posting results without bias is posting all the results that you have including results of the styles that do not make it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.