Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:18:22 09/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2002 at 14:51:33, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 10, 2002 at 13:46:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 10, 2002 at 11:10:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On September 10, 2002 at 04:57:20, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >>> >>>>a new episode in the never ending race : >>>> >>>>"NEC will show a Madison system with 32 processors"... >>>>http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103-956973.html >>>> >>>>http://zdnet.com.com/2251-1110-957096.html >>> >>>that's too bad, because McKinley goes till 10000 processors :) >> >> >>In a very tough-to-use NUMA configuration.. > >If the alternative is a 10000 processor NUMA or a 32 processor >shared bus shared memory thing, i'll go for the NUMA nowadays :) you better rewrite like mad. With 10,000 processors some of that memory is going to be a lifetime away from a particular cpu...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.