Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 17:42:31 09/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2002 at 18:18:22, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On September 10, 2002 at 14:51:33, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On September 10, 2002 at 13:46:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On September 10, 2002 at 11:10:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On September 10, 2002 at 04:57:20, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >>>> >>>>>a new episode in the never ending race : >>>>> >>>>>"NEC will show a Madison system with 32 processors"... >>>>>http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103-956973.html >>>>> >>>>>http://zdnet.com.com/2251-1110-957096.html >>>> >>>>that's too bad, because McKinley goes till 10000 processors :) >>> >>> >>>In a very tough-to-use NUMA configuration.. >> >>If the alternative is a 10000 processor NUMA or a 32 processor >>shared bus shared memory thing, i'll go for the NUMA nowadays :) > > >you better rewrite like mad. With 10,000 processors some of that memory is >going to be a lifetime away from a particular cpu... the reward for that is a program that operates at 10 Teraherz and at very fast I2 processors. It's GREAT processors. A new generation simply which perhaps around summer 2003 will be in the big supercomputers too. I see they start shipping them around start of 2003 that I2.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.