Author: Moritz Berger
Date: 12:08:26 08/20/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 1998 at 13:47:47, blass uri wrote: > >On August 19, 1998 at 06:04:57, Dirk Frickenschmidt wrote: >>Zugzwang - Pavasovic,D (2475) [C43] >>Hans & Lenze It Lippstadt GER (8), 06.08.1998 >> >>1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5 Nd7 6.Qe2 Nxe5 7.Bxe4 dxe4 8.Qxe4 >>Be6 9.Qxe5 Qd7 10.0-0 Bd6 11.Qxg7 0-0-0 12.Qh6 Rdg8 13.g3 Rg6 14.Qh5 Bg4 15.Qd5 >>h5 16.Nc3 Kb8 17.Ne4 Bf3 18.Nc5 Qg4 19.Qxf7 h4 20.Nd7+ Ka8 21.Re1 Rgg8 22.Qe6 >>hxg3 23.fxg3 Qh5 0-1 > >Fritz5 found a better move 17.h4 because fritz5 has better positional >understanding of the position. >Is there another program that find 17.h4 >Is 17.h4 a saving move? 17.h4 doesn't save the game because of the forced line 17.h4 Bh3 18.Re1 Bxg3 19.fxg3 Rxg3+ 20.Kf2 Rg2+ (Rxc3 is too greedy and loses some pressure) 21.Qxg2 Bxg2 22.Kxg2 Rg8+ 23.Bg5 f6! 24.Re3 fxg -+ (a petite 16 ply combination) 22.Bg5 (blocking the g-file) also doesn't bring relief because of 22...Qh3! which only makes things worse. >Fritz5 does not understand that 17.Ne4 is losing because >it is weak in tactics like all the programs. Weak evaluation of king safety is crucial in allowing the position before move 17. Moritz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.