Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 02:19:27 09/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2002 at 20:17:21, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On September 10, 2002 at 19:52:32, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>If MTD(f) were linear [or linear behavior happened more than once in a blue >>moon], then PostModernist would not score nearly so well, I think. > >I'm fairly sure Andrew uses convergence accelerators, so it's not >strictly MTD(n,f) in PostModernist. > Yes. I do 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7... I've tried all sorts in my time: 1, 2, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 36, 36... 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 55, 55... 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 4... If I get FH, FH, FH, FH, FL, I start heading back down subtracting from the first numbner. All of these work better for me than just using 1 for every step. Andrew
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.