Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 06:02:32 09/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 11, 2002 at 07:51:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 11, 2002 at 05:12:43, Thorsten Czub wrote: > ><snipped> >>i do not change my mind. i did not looked / count the games so far. >> >>you don't understand how it works. >>if somebody is a bean-counter like you, you count all the day. >>you sit behind those machines when they are ready and count. >>i count when the work is done, and have stages where i watch and >>do not concentrate on statistics. when this process is over, >>i do stop the autoplayers and browse through the files full of garbage >>and copy/paste the games into readable PGN. > >Thanks for your comments about the way that you tested. >I believe that it helps you to get a better Rebel. > >The only point is that >we do not get an unbiased impression from the games >because of the data that is not posted >(I do not say that you have to post all the data and >I understand that it is practically impossible). > >We will be able to get an unbiased impression >of the strength of Rebel after you decide about >the final parameters for Rebel but only games after >your decision about the final parameters can >be included. > >It is still interesting to get information and I do not >ask you not to post it > >Hope for peace > >Uri Well, Thorsten achieved something remarkable tuning the Rebel parameters, both his versions perform significant better than the default setting. So far I have, TC-051 : 51-35 59.2% (+55 elo) TC-056 : 43-34 55.8% (+30 elo) Both matches are still in progress but I think the pattern is set. Well done Thorsten. Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.