Author: martin fierz
Date: 17:22:42 09/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 11, 2002 at 04:08:52, Fabien Letouzey wrote: salut fabien, >Sorry for the awkward style, it is my first posting here. I tried to be >precise to avoid misunderstanding. merci beaucoup! is all i can say. there was nothing awkward about that post! my whole interest in getting a pv out of the search rather than from the hashtable was that i wanted a guarantee that i got to the end of my PV, for debugging purposes, like if i want to find out why my program makes a certain bad move with a high score - what the hell was it thinking there? retrieving from the HT is ok most of the time, but obviously for this purpose, it is not so good because sometimes it will not give me the full PV because something was overwritten in the HT. in my implementation, i will also miss the entire qsearch because i don't store that in the HT. so your way of doing this really helps :-) and if i understand you correctly, then i can just get your "semiPV" for my last MTD test, and that actually IS what my program was thinking when it made the move, right? aloha martin
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.