Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Double blind and other controls against unconscious intentions

Author: Marc van Hal

Date: 13:14:37 09/12/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 11, 2002 at 20:09:03, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On September 11, 2002 at 18:58:02, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>The matches are still running, so I can not present games yet.
>
>they will not understand this mechanism.
>they will say: oh - you are not presenting ALL data. so where is the data
>you do not post. where is the data you hide.
>where is the faked material.
>or whatever claim they made.
>
>they have no other point than to wave with their hands and to
>say:
>
>its not true. its not possible. its a lie.
>
>
>:-))
>
>
>
>>I mainly posted this to show that Thorsten wasn't talking nonsense, if he would
>>I would say it too.
>>
>>Ed
>
>
>of course.
>and you have many machines in your machine park too, to prove it for yourself.
>
>they wave their hands and come with philosophical remarks about monod :-))
>and mistakes in science :-))) and unconsciousness :-))).
>
>but i am sitting behind those machines , live at championships, and i know
>that Rxe3 will come, and genius will lose this game.
>
>the difference is: they know from theory.
>and i have played out all those games at my home ... so i know that
>this or that will happen. not because i am a prophet, but because i tried
>it out long before. just a question of doing it, or not doing it.
>
>but they prefer not to do anything, and to hold holy speeches.
>
>they call this computerchess.
>
>'guess because somewhere a computer is involved and somehow it has to do with
>chess.
>
>but holy speeches do not win championships or matches in real life.







Again  a lot of nonsens is spoken
If you speak about a personelety you don't need to talk about everthing which
happens or could happen in the world or the universe
it is a personelty not more not less.
Speculating without real argumets doesn't make sence.
But I think it would be more wise to keep the results quiet and post them when
the matches against diferent engines are made and be sure everything went
properly
The treuth will always come out anyways.
If you then come up with the results you will stand steady as a rock.
(And that from a person who does not believe only in the results of computer
computer games.)
The other thing is if you indeed created something good you always stand alone
here i have been there I have done that.
And as far as you can see Ed is not intrested in paying for it anyways
You then have only 2 options keep it for your self or share it.
It is better then eating your own heart
Maybe Ed Schroder will put it in his program and somebody else might become
intrested in you doing this job for them!
Marc



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.