Author: Manfred Meiler
Date: 14:09:14 09/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2002 at 16:52:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On September 12, 2002 at 16:30:24, Manfred Meiler wrote: > >>>(12) Chessmaster 9000 : 112 (+ 34,= 46,- 32), 50.9 % >>> >>>Nimzo 8 : 4 (+ 2,= 1,- 1), 62.5 % >>>Fritz 5.32 : 10 (+ 5,= 5,- 0), 75.0 % >>>Chess Tiger 14.0 : 10 (+ 2,= 6,- 2), 50.0 % >>>Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 10 (+ 3,= 5,- 2), 55.0 % >>>Junior 7 : 4 (+ 1,= 0,- 3), 25.0 % >>>Shredder 5.32 : 5 (+ 2,= 2,- 1), 60.0 % >>>Deep Junior 7 : 10 (+ 6,= 1,- 3), 65.0 % >>>Fritz 7 001 : 10 (+ 1,= 3,- 6), 25.0 % >>>Fritz 7 008 : 5 (+ 0,= 4,- 1), 40.0 % >>>Crafty 18.13 : 10 (+ 5,= 5,- 0), 75.0 % >>>Tiger 15 normal : 14 (+ 3,= 6,- 5), 42.9 % >>>Shredder Paderborn : 10 (+ 3,= 3,- 4), 45.0 % >>>Deep Fritz 7 : 10 (+ 1,= 5,- 4), 35.0 % >>> >>>Sarah. >> >> >>Hi Sarah, >> >>your rating list is impressive ! >>Especially your results of CM9K (compared to CM8K) are promising for computer >>chessfriends here in Germany ... where's CM9K ain't in the stores yet ;-( >>Also the results of the upcoming Tiger 15 sound very good... >> >>Thanks for your efforts ! >> >>Manfred > >Hi Manfred >I am slightly disappointed about the results of CM9K. Where is the program >better than the best CM8K-settings? Please have a look at the results vs Fritz7 >and Junior7, I see no progress at all. Of course, too few games have been played >so far. >Kurt Hi Kurt, I meant (and wrote) about Sarah's results of CM9K compared to CM8K. The difference of 119 points between the default settings seems rather significant to me. Moreover: CM9K with special settings ... maybe your own UTZ settings in the future :-) ... will show further progress in the future, who knows ? Manfred BTW: In deutsch fiele es mir doch leichter mit Dir zu parlieren :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.