Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:58:48 09/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2002 at 07:56:03, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 12, 2002 at 07:13:16, Uri Blass wrote: >>I believe that thorsten can find improvements but >>I do not think that thorsten is a genius. > >everybody who has a pc can find out anything. >it needs no intelligence to do computerchess. it needs the will >to do it. >but some people feel no will to do computerchess. instead they feel >the will to talk about others who DO computerchess. >this is a kind of gossip about "famous people" and what they do. > >for those kind of people its not important to do something themselves, >instead they like to talk or philosophy or produce garbage about >what others said, what others did , what others have done to them, >its a kind of crying ! > >its a kind of masturbation. >those people i would call "fans". > >they devote the ones that do something, and read everything their "star" >does, and they feel the need to be WITH their stars. to be accepted within >the group of VIPs. > > >cheerleaders. > >since i do not believe that ANY of us is better than another, >and i do not believe in fandom and stars and genius and >that somebody is more worth than another, i do not like those >people. It is clear that there are people who have bigger talent to play chess than other people and I also believe that there are people with bigger talent to find better personalities. The only way to know is by competition when the opponents use the same time to find better personality. There is no competition in these conditions so we do not know who has better talent but I believe that finding improvement is not an hard task. I believe that I can find ideas for improvement based on watching games and analyzing them and after seeing some patterns I can change things and get improvement. (for example I found that movei lost games because of underevaluating mobility so I increased the mobility scores(of course I need to be careful not to increase them too much but I usually try to look for the smallest changes to avoid the mistakes) Movei is not close to the level of Rebel but it may be possible to see some patterns in the losses of Rebel espacielly if Ed added more parameters in the evaluation without testing and you do not need to be genius for it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.