Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 16:07:35 09/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2002 at 18:54:12, martin fierz wrote: >ok, but you should not make any conclusions based on 10 games. and because i >couldn't believe anybody still does that what you say makes no sense. of course one can make very precise conclusions based on 10 or even 1 game. even a few moves can give information enough. the main problem is: not anybody who is not used to do this, can do that. if you want to do this, you need to be used to do it. like everything in life. there is no evidence that 400 games are more precise than 1 game. the error margin of 400 games is still IMO less precise than good "guessing" after a few samples. >i asked him first to find out if that >was really what he was doing... but i never jump to conclusions before the match is over... you can do whatever you want. i am doing this job for many years. i am used to judge after one game, after a few moves, a few main lines. or at least: a few games. there is nothing special with this. the feeling directs you. and you can later prove the thesis by playing many games.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.