Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 05:32:20 09/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2002 at 19:24:09, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On September 12, 2002 at 16:14:37, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>Again a lot of nonsens is spoken >>If you speak about a personelety you don't need to talk about everthing which >>happens or could happen in the world or the universe >>it is a personelty not more not less. > > >exactly. its only tweaking, only tuning. >just because its all very boring in the summer. > >>Speculating without real argumets doesn't make sence. > >i am not speculating. the others speculate. >i have the machines, the programs, the style, >and the games. > >there is no need for speculation from my side. >its always the "hear-said"-lobby that needs to speculate. > > > >>But I think it would be more wise to keep the results quiet and post them when >>the matches against diferent engines are made and be sure everything went >>properly > > >i have to disagree. > >i am doing this for fun. not because i want to get a prize or >a title, not for money or fame. > >its fun. and i like to share this fun to others. >i have worked with many programmers. >and i am doing it for fun. > >if it would make NO fun, i would not do it. > > >>The treuth will always come out anyways. > >right. the ssdf need some months to find out, when it was released. >so at least 1/2 a year later. > > > >>If you then come up with the results you will stand steady as a rock. >>(And that from a person who does not believe only in the results of computer >>computer games.) > > >:-) > >i do not need to prove anything. as i said: i am not bought by anybody. >you cannot buy my opinion. i am doing this for me. >for my fun. > >not because anybody wants it. > > > > >>The other thing is if you indeed created something good you always stand alone >>here i have been there I have done that. > >there are always idiots who cannot share things. >they need to destroy. > > >>And as far as you can see Ed is not intrested in paying for it anyways > > >? > >i have enough money. >i am not interested in money or anything else. >it must be interesting for me. > > > >>You then have only 2 options keep it for your self or share it. >>It is better then eating your own heart > >:-)) > > >>Maybe Ed Schroder will put it in his program and somebody else might become >>intrested in you doing this job for them! >>Marc > >whatever. > >it was my intention to show that it is possible to tune a commercial engine, >and to make it stronger. > >the question is: how you do measure strength. > >IMO there are many ways to measure it, that are faster than the ssdf-method. Well that's for sure the human eye can be indeed a faster measure Also theoritcal knowledge can help here. And get a good look at the main engine and what is good and bad about it. Getting on the top of de SSDF list does not even mean it's the strongest program either It can be only a style where other engines have move difecultys with. But in Depth they might be weaker then number4 Getting attacked by making a personelety does not make any sence here because then I can attack meany person here who created a CM personelety and claimed it was o so good and it turned out to be nothig good. (ButI never did) About the fun of sharing i gues this turned out bad now But don't let them take away the fun you have with it. Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.