Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Testmethods for n=0, n=1 and n=>800 - For Beginners and 'old Hands'

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 08:25:15 09/13/02

On September 13, 2002 at 11:15:32, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On September 13, 2002 at 11:06:57, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>Again I must agree. Since all modern progs are founded on these free (?) >sources by defintion they are stronger. How could they be weaker?
>
>Reality, it seems, does not quite agree with you.
>
>But don't let that stop you.
>
>--
>GCP

Sorry. Then let me change the statement into: For the professionals the openly
published code of Crafty is understandable in its details. (yes/no) And
therefore they are able to think about other ways to implement novelties. This
seems to be logical. They won't deny to think about Crafty code for sure.
Perhaps on a certain level it's enough to hear about a new feature without code
at all. Then you simply develop your own solution. But the idea came not from
your brain. You disagree?

(I confess, if this is necessary, that I did never even try to program chess.)

Rolf Tueschen

Re: Testmethods for n=0, n=1 and n=>800 - For Beginners and 'old Hands' Uri Blass 08:57:50 09/13/02
- Re: Testmethods for n=0, n=1 and n=>800 - For Beginners and 'old Hands' Rolf Tueschen 09:30:49 09/13/02
  - Re: Testmethods for n=0, n=1 and n=>800 - For Beginners and 'old Hands' Uri Blass 09:52:13 09/13/02
    - Re: Testmethods for n=0, n=1 and n=>800 - For Beginners and 'old Hands' Rolf Tueschen 10:33:06 09/13/02
      - Re: Testmethods for n=0, n=1 and n=>800 - For Beginners and 'old Hands' Uri Blass 10:47:33 09/13/02
  - Re: Testmethods for n=0, n=1 and n=>800 - For Beginners and 'old Hands' Dave Gomboc 09:45:26 09/13/02
Re: Testmethods for n=0, n=1 and n=>800 - For Beginners and 'old Hands' Gian-Carlo Pascutto 08:37:19 09/13/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.