Author: martin fierz
Date: 15:39:40 09/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 2002 at 15:45:05, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >I'm sorry but I cannot agree! Would you think taht Elo is a universal utility >for calculating the chess performance of humans alone or humans and apes and >flowers? Remind you of the apples and beans theorem. It doesn't make sense to >make a ranking with the Elo for totally different species. MEPHISTO ROMA has >nothing to do with JUNIOR 7. Besides that they both play chess. But where is the >point for comparisons? i've played a tournament games against a GMs rated 2697.i've often played first-round games in opens against beginners with a 1600 rating. it all counts for my rating... why do you need to make up special rules for computer ratings if we don't need it for human ratings? aloha martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.