Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 09:25:11 09/15/02

Here is the second game I examined and I saw the same mechanism. Also here
Shredder leaves his book with incredible disadvantage. How can such a game show
anything about the special tuning of Rebel Macheide?

Shredder 6 - XP Machëide x2cou_51

[D] r1bqkb2/1p3p1p/p1np4/4pp2/4P2P/2NBN3/PPP2r2/R2QK2R b KQq h3 0 1

Analysis by Fritz 7:

13...f4 14.Kxf2 fxe3+ 15.Kg2 Qf6 16.Qe2 Qg6+ 17.Kh2
  µ  (-0.75)   Depth: 6/15   00:00:00  26kN
13...f4 14.Kxf2 fxe3+ 15.Kg2 Qf6 16.Qe2 Qg6+ 17.Kh2 Bh6
  µ  (-0.75)   Depth: 7/24   00:00:01  74kN
13...f4--
  ³  (-0.47)   Depth: 8/22   00:00:09  144kN
13...f4
  ³  (-0.47)   Depth: 8/22   00:00:09  165kN
13...fxe4
  ³  (-0.50)   Depth: 8/23   00:00:10  210kN
13...Rf4
  ³  (-0.53)   Depth: 8/25   00:00:14  358kN
13...Rf4 14.Qh5 Nb4 15.0-0-0 fxe4 16.Bc4 h6 17.Nxe4 Be7 18.a3 Rxe4
  ³  (-0.59)   Depth: 8/25   00:00:14  359kN
13...Rf4 14.Qh5 Nb4 15.0-0-0 fxe4 16.Bc4 h6 17.Nxe4 Be7 18.a3 Rxe4
  ³  (-0.59)   Depth: 9/23   00:00:20  477kN
13...Rf4 14.Qh5 Nb4 15.0-0-0 fxe4 16.Bc4 h6 17.Nxe4 Be7 18.a3 Rxe4
  ³  (-0.59)   Depth: 10/30   00:00:36  1208kN
13...Rf4!
  µ  (-0.88)   Depth: 11/34   00:01:18  4335kN
13...Rf4 14.Qh5 Nb4 15.0-0-0 fxe4 16.Be2 Be6 17.a3 Qb6 18.Nf1
  µ  (-1.00)   Depth: 11/34   00:01:44  6623kN
13...Rf4 14.Qh5 Nb4 15.a3 Qb6 16.Qe2 Nc6 17.Ncd5 Qxb2 18.Qd1
  µ  (-1.03)   Depth: 12/36   00:03:37  16675kN
13...Rf4 14.Qh5 Nb4 15.a3 Qb6 16.Qe2 Nxd3+ 17.cxd3 Qd8 18.Qh5
  µ  (-0.97)   Depth: 13/37   00:08:43  43191kN

(, MyTown 15.09.2002)

Of course Rebel played Rf4 and won. Shredder played 14 ef5 instead of Qh5, but
that was not of big importance.

The game:



Shredder 6 - XP Machëide x2cou_51
40/120, K6-400 Schachcomputerwelt (3), 11.09.2002

1.e4 book 0s 1...c5 25s 2.Nf3 book 0s 2...Nc6 25s (d6) 3.d4 book 0s 3...cxd4 1s
4.Nxd4 book 0s 4...Nf6 4s 5.Nc3 book 0s 5...e5 1s (d6) 6.Ndb5 book 0s 6...d6 1s
7.Bg5 book 0s 7...a6 1s 8.Bxf6 book 0s 8...gxf6 1s 9.Na3 book 0s 9...f5 1s (b5)
10.Bd3 +0.08/12 3:49m 10...Rg8 7s 11.Nc4 book 0s 11...Rxg2 2s 12.Ne3 book 0s
12...Rxf2 3s 13.h4 book 0s 13...Rf4 4:42m 14.exf5 -1.52/12 3:16m 14...Rxh4 9:25m
(Nb4) 15.Kd2 -1.51/13 12:50m 15...Nd4 4:20m (Nb4) 16.Ncd5 -1.99/12 4:29m
16...Bh6 5:28m 17.Qf1 -2.75/11 7:34m 17...Bxe3+ 9s (Bxf5) 18.Nxe3 -2.04/12 2:55m
18...e4 2:28m 19.Rxh4 -1.76/12 4:10m 19...Qxh4 28s 20.Be2 -1.76/13 8:39m
20...Qh2 4s (Bd7) 21.c3 -1.91/12 3:33m 0-1



Rolf Tueschen

Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Jonas Cohonas 10:03:14 09/15/02
- Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Rolf Tueschen 10:39:19 09/15/02
  - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Thorsten Czub 14:05:09 09/15/02
  - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Terry Ripple 11:28:17 09/15/02
  - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel pavel 11:21:27 09/15/02
    - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Rolf Tueschen 13:00:26 09/15/02
  - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Jonas Cohonas 11:09:52 09/15/02
    - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Rolf Tueschen 12:27:48 09/15/02
      - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Jonas Cohonas 14:16:04 09/15/02
        
        Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Rolf Tueschen 15:51:10 09/15/02
        
        Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Jonas Cohonas 22:57:11 09/15/02
        
        Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Thorsten Czub 16:02:39 09/15/02
- Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Jeroen van Dorp 10:22:55 09/15/02
  - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Jonas Cohonas 10:29:52 09/15/02
- Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Thorsten Czub 10:13:44 09/15/02
  - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Jonas Cohonas 10:39:53 09/15/02
Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Thorsten Czub 09:35:02 09/15/02
- Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Marc van Hal 11:35:01 09/15/02
  - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Thorsten Czub 14:12:05 09/15/02
    - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Marc van Hal 09:27:49 09/16/02
      - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Thorsten Czub 11:09:53 09/16/02
- Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Rolf Tueschen 09:52:15 09/15/02
  - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Thorsten Czub 10:17:12 09/15/02
    - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Chessfun 13:29:44 09/15/02
    - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Rolf Tueschen 10:48:55 09/15/02
      - Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Thorsten Czub 14:17:13 09/15/02
Re: Third example, the same game as the second example with a variation Rolf Tueschen 09:29:28 09/15/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.