Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 09:52:15 09/15/02

Go up one level in this thread

On September 15, 2002 at 12:35:02, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On September 15, 2002 at 12:25:11, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>How can such a game show
>>anything about the special tuning of Rebel Macheide?
>
>its not showing anything. it only shows that shredder lost.

But surely not because of the new tuning of Rebel, I suppose. But because of its
book. To make it short. Why do you present such games, such data, without any
meaning for your main intention, namely to improve Rebel XP Macheide??

Rolf Tueschen


>if you want to see a show, you must make your own testing.
>
>if you want to learn about the tuning of rebel, you can read:
>
>http://hometown.aol.de/mclanecxantia/knaak.html

• Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Thorsten Czub 10:17:12 09/15/02
  • Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Chessfun 13:29:44 09/15/02
  • Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Rolf Tueschen 10:48:55 09/15/02
    • Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel Thorsten Czub 14:17:13 09/15/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.