Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:13:44 09/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 15, 2002 at 13:03:14, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >Rolf you are getting a bit carried away here, if shredder or it's book makes a >bad move you should not blame thorsten for it, the only thing you could argue >here is the validity of publishing such a game in terms of accuracy. > >BTW i have read your posts for a while now and it seems you are looking for >mistakes no matter who posts, do you have some past issues that was left >unfinished? > >Regards >Jonas the method of playing autoplayer matches for finding out about strength is not MY method. i call this bean counting. but many people, and some programmers too, like this method. therefore for THEM it is only a prove when you have autoplayer data. i do prefer game examples, where you can show a special feature. rolf is forgetting that my article (he obviously quotes out) is full of examples what i have done and especially with examples where rebel played in default mode and my macheide-style is playing from the same position. he forgets all the other information, picks out a game that he likes to choose as an example, and comes with mud. thats typical. when i present NO autoplayer material, people piss on it because its not statistical verified. when i come with autoplayer games/data, they piss on it because of whatever mistakes. some say i would not post ALL games (chessfun), rolf complaints THAT i do post all games. don't you see what is going on here. you post something to keep people and fans / freaks informed about a new style , a new program that plays good, and few people piss on it. Why ? i think they piss on it because of personal problems. It's not the data you post, it YOU that is the problem for them. You could post the telephone-book of NY and they would complain about. this way they destroy computerchess IMO. because nobody wants to post anymore anything interesting because those people piss on it whatever you do. I have seen this here in this forum for a long time. it happens to bob hyatt too. its a kind of personal fight. the content is not important. its the history of mud throwing that was in rgcc and here in CCC long time ago. its not about computerchess- or human behaviour. its how dogs behave ... if it would be about computerchess, there would be content in it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.