Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Second example for a bad opening of the opponent in the tuning of Rebel

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 10:17:12 09/15/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 15, 2002 at 12:52:15, Rolf Tueschen wrote:

>But surely not because of the new tuning of Rebel, I suppose. But because of its
>book. To make it short. Why do you present such games, such data, without any
>meaning for your main intention, namely to improve Rebel XP Macheide??

???

when you do an autoplayer match, you have to post the games. otherwise
it is faked.

you cannot leave out the games you don't like.
or the games that do not transport your message.

if you do statistics, you have to count. COUNT. that is not

content. its only: counting.


maybe you should discuss this with chessfun. she is the expert in
this forum for counting senseless autoplayer data.


if you want to learn about HOW and WHY tuning of rebel,
you can click on the other links that explain it to you.

>>http://hometown.aol.de/mclanecxantia/knaak.html




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.