Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 14:05:09 09/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 15, 2002 at 13:39:19, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >Perhaps I can explain you my intentions with concrete examples. > >Thorsten is now making propaganda i am not doing propaganda. this is a word from nazi germany. i don't want to be associated with goebbels (propaganda-minister) or any other nazi. please stop saying i am doing propaganda. >about a new Macheide style for Rebel and he's >doing it for months now. right. it took so long. i invented the style for century4. the idea was to make rebel century play more dynmaic. than ed made rebel XP. i was completely disapointed about the positional style of the default engine. this was very heavy to see in games against fritz. therefore i tried to bring my style (that worked for century4) and adapt it for rebel XP. this took time. as rebel XP is very different to rebel century4. >You know I am interested how Thorsten could achieve to >put LASKER (!), the great Wch of human chess, into Rebel! And making Rebel >stronger this way. if you want to know, why don't you refer to the article that is on my web site for "months" ? why don't you write me an email if this article is not to your satisfaction ? because you are INTERESTED sooooo much ? >As >a scientist :-))) very funny rolf. >I know that the results can't prove that the tuning of Thorsten had >this effect! ???? >I know that these wins mean nothing at all. ????? > And Thorsten has just >confirmed that he has the same opinion!! as a scientist, you should know that statistics need to publish the data. no matter if the opponent died for falling from the chair or because the power supply was not working. >I made that point and nothing else. really ? >Now the next question could be why Thorsten is presenting data with no meaning >for his main intention. And more, when he knows it himself! as a scientist you should know why. >Perhaps you can better understand me by now. :-)) Perhaps it would be much easier for >you to understand me if you had my experience in science. oh man. > Because there you >should make sure that your new data should mean a thing! But in a hobby I would >agree that it's not such great disaster. a point is a point. if you would have ever played in a tournament such a WCCC you would know that the win is important.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.