Author: Heiner Marxen
Date: 05:47:29 09/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 2002 at 19:39:32, leonid wrote:
>On September 14, 2002 at 16:58:23, Heiner Marxen wrote:
>
>>On September 14, 2002 at 10:44:49, leonid wrote:
>>
>>>On September 14, 2002 at 10:14:52, Paul wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 14, 2002 at 09:47:21, leonid wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On September 14, 2002 at 09:26:25, leonid wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On September 14, 2002 at 08:51:31, Paul wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On September 14, 2002 at 07:55:35, leonid wrote:
>>>>>>>>Still, maybe, You will be tempted for something more heavy and I this way will
>>>>>>>>be able to find more on this position:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>[D]2qRQq2/p6P/q1BqqR1N/r6B/n1QNQQ1B/r6k/b1QKNP1q/bq4qn w - -
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On description of this mate I can see that it was solved by selective in 13
>>>>>>>>moves but brute force search went not up to the end in order to find shortest
>>>>>>>>move. Brute force search, without finding any mate, went only 9 moves deep.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>This one was indeed a lot more difficult, mine didn't fare so well here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>06:49 WM11 07 Q8xe6+ Qdxe6 Qff3+ Rxf3 Qxf3+ Kxh4 Nhf5+ Rxf5 Nxf5+ ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So it found a mate in 11 in almost 7 minutes, with an incomplete pv ... these
>>>>>>>d#*&#@rned hashtables ;) ... will have to think about this ... any tips anyone?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Please indicate Your result.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>>>>Leonid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thanks for your mates as usual ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thanks, Paul!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Now I can see that second one is no far then 11 moves. I can even put this
>>>>>>position at 10 moves by brute force for night. If braching factor will not
>>>>>>suddenly jump, then it should be enough time for me for finding its depth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>First position have excellent time!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Mine, on usual setting, found mate in 1.75 sec.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>>Leonid.
>>>>>
>>>>>Paul, just after writing my message, I started to see second position in my file
>>>>>to indicate 11 moves. When I finally found it (I not indicate before on what
>>>>>page I had it), I looked that it was in reality solved by selected in 11 moves,
>>>>>just as You said. Before upper part of page was covered with page keeper and it
>>>>>is how I missed some additional description. If I knew this yesterday, when I
>>>>>found this position, I could put search for 10 moves by brute force at night.
>>>>
>>>>Hey!! ... so you tricked us ... that's not fair ... I would have found it much
>>>>faster if I'd known! ... just kiddin' ... :)
>>>
>>>I was actually tricked by myself. I did expected that this position was very
>>>difficult since I could see that it was solved by very slow selective and only
>>>at 13 moves. 13 moves at large default setting (I use it before searching by
>>>much easier solution) took 13.5 minutes to solve. When I looked into 11 moves
>>>selective solution its paramether indicated that solution was almost simple.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Selective in 11 moves was solved in 18 seconds. Usual setting.
>>>>
>>>>Not bad at all ... you really should implement hash to get a bit faster though
>>>>... ;)
>>
>>Chest is still running for depth 11, but after 3478 secs has already reported
>>that there is no mate in 10. So, we are already sure, that 11 is minimal
>>depth.
>
>Paul just said to me that there are no mate in 10.
>
>># 4 0.09s 17kN [ 10.28] 1.07 737- 0
>># 5 0.96s [ 10.67] 137kN [ 7.88] 1.21 8654- 0
>># 6 6.32s [ 6.58] 791kN [ 5.79] 1.49 66512- 0
>># 7 31.30s [ 4.95] 3675kN [ 4.65] 2.11 351756- 0
>># 8 143.98s [ 4.60] 16349kN [ 4.45] 2.73 1718242- 7352
>># 9 668.36s [ 4.64] 73337kN [ 4.49] 3.46 8452143- 5252957
>># 10 3477.74s [ 5.20] 373030kN [ 5.09] 4.02 45004182- 41804949
Chest completed its job:
# 11 16881.61s [ 4.85] 1819969kN [ 4.88] 4.43 226032315- 222833082
PV: Q8xe6+ Qdxe6 Qff3+ Rxf3 Qxf3+ Qgg3 Nf4+ Kxh4 Qxg3+ Qxg3 Nf3+ Qxf3 Ng2+ Kh3
Qh4+ Kxg2 Bhxf3+ Kg1 Qxh1+ Kxf2 Qg2#
Q8xe6+ Qdxe6 Qff3+ Rxf3 Qxf3+ ...+8
Qhg3 Nf4+ ...+3
-*- Nf4+ ...+2
Qcxe6 Nxg1+ Qbxg1 Qef5+ ...+5
Qhxg1 Bg4+ ...+5
Rf5 Bg4+ Kxh4 Nxf5#
Qxg4 Qxg4#
Qg4 Qfxg4#
I.e. the key move is unique, and Chest needed 4.9 hours.
Cheers,
Heiner
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.