Author: Harald Faber
Date: 08:31:50 09/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2002 at 09:01:53, Brian Katz wrote: >It appears that we are being lied to when they say that DF7 is stronger than F7 >even if only a single processor is used. This is nonsense. >If you remember, the same thing was said of Deep Fritz as compared to Fritz 6. >( "Increased endgame knowledge and increased positional play") I find it odd >that they would use the same exact wording for this advertisement, yet I still >bought it, pardon the pun. DeepFritz (6) is definitely stronger than Fritz 6 and this has been proved. Like DeepFritz 7 is definitely stronger than Fritz 7 and will be proved. Not only by me. As I already wrote, I have some games, and the results look clearly better than Fritz 7 results. >Perhaps it should be called Deep-Putz 7. >All replies welcome and looked forward to. >Regards >Brian To me it looks you are still trolling around. What did you do to provide your theory? Did you compare Fritz 7 - Shredder Paderborn with DeepFritz 7 - Shredder Paderborn e.g., same openings or at least same number of games ( >20)? How many? Did you play vs. several progs or only one? Did you only play Fritz 7 - DeepFritz 7 ? Play Fritz 7 vs. prog A, B, C, D and then DeepFritz 7 vs. A, B, C and D. And then compare again. Until you REALLY COMPARED you better stop whining.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.