Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 11:12:44 09/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 15, 2002 at 20:45:57, martin fierz wrote: >why do you have to make sure that the index is a multiple of N when you do N >probes? The idea it the following. The 1-N indeces are not handled all the same (so, I vision this like an N-table approach). Assume, they are somewhat sorted by importance, and you allways replace the least important, while others are supposed to be more priveledged, and should stay there longer. If the index is not a multiple of N, the "allways replace" entry of another index will overwrite the priveledged entries. Regards, Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.