Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:52:07 09/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2002 at 13:00:58, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>
>*Total result is simply better for Deep Fritz7 and even if in some positions
>Fritz7 plays better it does not mean that Deep Fritz7 is no imporovement.
>You can expect maybe improvement of 20-30 elo from Deep Fritz7.
>
>Chessbase never claimed that it is 100 elo better
>
>Uri*
I agree, seems logical.
Deep Fritz is better than Fritz 6 by 33 points on a K6-2 450 at the SSDF.
Fritz 7 for some reason only lists as 6 points better than Fritz 6.
I'd like to see them let Fritz 6 run on a 1200 and see what the difference is
then between it and Fritz 7.
Anyway after 117 games with Deep Fritz 7 here is what I have.
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 Tiger 15 normal style : 2679 42 33 206 59.0 % 2616 44.2 %
2 Tiger 15 gambit agres : 2677 104 84 40 57.5 % 2625 35.0 %
3 Deep Fritz 7 : 2666 58 48 117 57.7 % 2612 36.8 %
4 Shredder Paderborn : 2644 80 57 76 51.3 % 2635 34.2 %
5 Fritz 7 002 : 2643 45 41 169 61.2 % 2563 37.3 %
6 Fritz 7 008 : 2640 40 33 219 60.7 % 2564 42.9 %
7 Fritz 7 001 : 2637 39 33 237 58.6 % 2576 39.7 %
8 Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 2625 22 18 749 59.0 % 2561 41.7 %
9 Fritz 7 (No MMX) : 2624 49 36 162 58.0 % 2568 44.4 %
10 Chess Tiger 14.0 : 2620 24 19 640 56.9 % 2572 43.1 %
(3) Deep Fritz 7 : 117 (+ 46,= 43,- 28), 57.7 %
Fritz 6 : 10 (+ 4,= 4,- 2), 60.0 %
Deep Fritz : 10 (+ 4,= 5,- 1), 65.0 %
Chess Tiger 14.0 : 10 (+ 1,= 4,- 5), 30.0 %
Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 18 (+ 8,= 6,- 4), 61.1 %
Junior 7 : 10 (+ 4,= 1,- 5), 45.0 %
Crafty 18.13 : 10 (+ 8,= 1,- 1), 85.0 %
Shredder 6 : 10 (+ 7,= 2,- 1), 80.0 %
Tiger 15 normal style : 19 (+ 2,= 12,- 5), 42.1 %
Shredder Paderborn : 10 (+ 4,= 3,- 3), 55.0 %
Chessmaster 9000 : 10 (+ 4,= 5,- 1), 65.0 %
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.