Author: Mark Young
Date: 07:58:01 08/23/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 1998 at 10:46:06, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On August 23, 1998 at 08:35:34, blass uri wrote: > >>>Optimal is what I have it set to also. >>I think that you have different books and this is the explanation for the >>different results for fritz5. >>This is the only explanation I can find that the move 13...a6 was played in the >>tournament when the chance of this move is 0% in Mark Young's book. >>What is the reason for the difference? >>which book was used in the ssdf games? >> >>Uri > >I use Power.books for fritz5. >I tried to replay the game on another machine, some moves that were played were >rare, but they appeared after some tries, i was able to replay a6. >If mark says the chances that a6 comes is SERO, than this cannot be true. >The move happened on the original machine and also on another machine. >On both machines i used power.ctg with optimal clicked on... > >The sense of % chances is that sometimes the moves comes, and sometimes not. >If a move would have SERO chances, it would be knocked off and would never >appear. When I am able to replay the moves, the chances cannot be sero. > >I have no idea what this is all about. I have no will to discuss any move each >program plays over and over again. This is extra work and i find this work extra >senseless, especially when the SERO more appears also on another machine. I just ask a question. I could not reproduce the moves. And in all the games their has been a pattern of very rare moves being played in the games. So I ask if you had fritz 5 set to optimal. No big deal.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.