Author: James T. Walker
Date: 18:06:59 09/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2002 at 17:46:46, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On September 16, 2002 at 16:06:32, Maurizio De Leo wrote: > >>You posted 20 lines of deep insight about science, but you seem not to >>understand that the SSDF is pefectly correct, if you just read it in the right >>way. What it says is that Fritz 7 ON AN AMD 1200 is stronger than Genius ON A >>P90 or of mephisto roma ON HIS ORIGINAL HARDWARE. >>As Uri said a "player" in the ssdf is just software+hardware. In fact Fritz6 >>K6-450 and Fritz6 AMD1200 are 2 DIFFERENT entries.Simple as that. >> >>Maurizio > >My point is related to testing. (NB that the 'testing' is insinuated by SSDF >itself by the presentation of the ranges +/-. But if you are testing you must >hold your variables constant. Otherwise your data becomes biased.) > >Rolf Tueschen "hold your variables constant" ??
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.