Author: Chessfun
Date: 09:30:58 09/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 2002 at 10:39:10, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 17, 2002 at 09:56:29, pavel wrote: > >>On September 17, 2002 at 09:52:49, Uri Blass wrote: >> >> >>> >>>Game 2 and 6 are the same in the first 35 moves. >>> >>>I think that the ssdf should not test chessmaster because it seems to have no >>>learning function. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Did CM8k had learning function, does all the programs in SSDF have learning >>function? >>If not, than Cm9k should be tested by SSDF. >> >>cheers, >>pavs > >The fact that programs in the past were tested without learning does not justify >continuing this. > >The problem is that the result may be dependent more on luck. >If program A will play 20 games against chessmaster and program B will play >40 games in the next list then you can expect B to earn rating and A may suffer >from it. > >This does the error in the ssdf list bigger and this is a good reason not to >test it. > >Uri Throw it in a CB gui as we do other winboard programs, add general.ctg to it as we do other winboard programs, and there you go. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.