Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Position where all programs fail (wrong, Gandalf 3.0 don´t)

Author: Ilya P. Kozachenko

Date: 13:24:37 08/23/98

Go up one level in this thread



On August 22, 1998 at 09:46:50, Hans Christian Lykke wrote:

>On August 21, 1998 at 11:40:00, Moritz Berger wrote:
>
>>After some analysis I arrived at the conclusion that white is lost after
>>11.Qxg7?? (the novelty in this game). Black has a forced win with accurate play,
>>no matter how white tries to defend afterwards.
>>
>>I have found no program so far that didn't play 11.Qxg7 even at overnight
>>analysis.
>>
>>Is there any program that resists to the temptation of Qxg7???
>>
>>Moritz
>>
>>Zugzwang - Pavasovic,D (2475) [C43]
>>Hans & Lenze It Lippstadt GER (8), 06.08.1998>
>>1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 Nxe4 4.Bd3 d5 5.Nxe5 Nd7 6.Qe2 Nxe5 7.Bxe4 dxe4 8.Qxe4
>>Be6 9.Qxe5 Qd7 10.0-0 Bd6 11.Qxg7 0-0-0 12.Qh6 Rdg8 13.g3 Rg6 14.Qh5 Bg4 15.Qd5
>>h5 16.Nc3 Kb8 17.Ne4 Bf3 18.Nc5 Qg4 19.Qxf7 h4 20.Nd7+ Ka8 21.Re1 Rgg8 22.Qe6
>>hxg3 23.fxg3 Qh5 0-1
>

K6-233:
F5 - Qxe7 after 1 hour and 14th ply
Virtual Chess  II - Qxe7 after 1 hour and  266.000.000 nodes seen
Hiarcs -  not found after 1 hour also...

>
>On my P200MMX 64MB Gandalf 3.0 is playing Qe2 af 7 min. 32. sec. with the score
>0.30 for white!

Is Gandalf the best PC Chess Program ? :)

>
>The line
>
>Qe2	0-0
>Nc3	Qe6
>Qe4	Qb6
>Qd3	c6
>Ne4	Bf5
>Re1



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.