Author: James Swafford
Date: 04:36:01 09/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2002 at 04:16:28, Andrew Williams wrote: >On September 17, 2002 at 21:31:17, James Swafford wrote: > Your numbers seem high relative to everyone else... but I suppose that's because you're constantly searching with a narrow search window? I haven't implemented PVS or MTD(f) yet, so maybe I'm not doing so bad afterall. The smallest window I'm searching with now (from the root) is +/- half a pawn on each side of the last alpha score. Thanks Andrew! -- James >Hi James, > >Here are some results for postmodernist: > >Position 1: >=========== >NODES: ab: 605505 q: 915527 tot: 1521032 >probes: 1491339 hits: 315293 cutoffs: 210841 secondary: 27025 >probes: 98% hits: 21% cutoffs: 66% secondary: 8% > > >Position 2: >=========== >NODES: ab: 1760510 q: 766490 tot: 2527000 >probes: 2472152 hits: 1502633 cutoffs: 1200327 secondary: 147757 >probes: 97% hits: 60% cutoffs: 79% secondary: 9% > > >Position 3: >=========== >NODES: ab: 508192 q: 1037811 tot: 1546003 >probes: 1543924 hits: 265514 cutoffs: 163079 secondary: 20231 >probes: 99% hits: 17% cutoffs: 61% secondary: 7% > > >The percentages are (L to R): > >% of nodes for which PM probed the table (PM probes in qsearch too). >% of probes for which PM finds a matching entry >% of matching entries which cause a cutoff based on bounds in the entry >% of matching entries where the bestMove in the entry causes a cutoff > > > >Andrew > > > >> >>I'm skeptical about my hash efficiency - it seems to me I'm not >>getting enough hits from my hash tables. >> >>I wonder if some of you would post some numbers for me to compare >>by running the following 3 positions: >> >>r4k2/q4npp/P2P4/2p1R3/2N5/6PP/Q5K1/8 w - - bm Re7; id "ECM.1028"; >>7k/p7/1R5K/6r1/6p1/6P1/8/8 w - - b6b7; >>r1bq1rk1/pp2bp1p/2p2np1/3p2B1/3P4/2NQ2N1/PPP2PPP/4RRK1 w - - bm Rxe7; id >>"ECM.1068"; >> >>The first and last are from GCP's ECM-GCP suite and the second is >>from WAC. >> >>Anyway, here's what I'm getting (10 seconds per problem): >> >>Position 1: 3931063 nodes, 318411 interior nodes. >> fail highs: 10866 (3%); fl: 9929 (3%); ex: 671 (0%) >> hash mvs played: 10660 >> >>Position 2: 4944963 nodes, 3102047 interior nodes. >> fh: 1531962 (49%); fl: 432594 (13%); ex: 2836 (0%) >> hash mvs played: 602039 >> >>Position 3: 3847265 nodes, 222358 interior nodes. >> fh: 3443 (1%); fl: 2926 (1%); ex: 151 (0%) >> hash mvs played: 11931 >> >>The ratios change very little if I run the positions at 30 seconds. >> >>Thanks to anyone that takes the time... (which is hopefully a >>positive number of people)... >> >>-- >>James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.