Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Differentiations, many thanks (was moderation

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 13:34:28 09/18/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 18, 2002 at 08:24:45, Marc van Hal wrote:

>A question for you Rolf
>If you say that every result should be taken with a grain of salt

Thanks for the question, but I think it was clear that it was mainly Ed Schroder
who told me so. So, what I was doing, I quoted it what Ed had said. I have a
different opinion about results. Either they are statistically interesting or
they are not.

The reason why I discussed Thorsten's results was the context. He had said that
he was creating a style. Then he played some games to see if the style was
stronger than the default. Thorsten claimed that the style was stronger since
the games showed it. What I did then was showing that theses games against
Shredder did not prove a better strength.

Please leave out fecal vocabulary. What I did had nothing to do with -
"pissing". But perhaps I have overseen something.

The reason why I do not debate about the results of others here is simply that I
never saw such contradictions in the presentation and most results resp. games I
download and store them without even playing them. It's also a question of time.
Hope this helps.

Rolf Tueschen


>Why do you make such along discusion about it?
>And why only against Thorsten?
>This looks to me as a personal attack in the first place.
>If the person your pissing at becomes angry you don't know why.
>Maybe you find it normal that people accept this?
>Even if Thorsten would not have given honest results but he enjoys it let him.
>I also came to the conclusion you get pissed at a lot if you realy have
>something to say here.
>So might it be so you are jalous?
>And again if not why are you making such a long discusion about it?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.