Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 15:02:02 09/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2002 at 16:34:28, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On September 18, 2002 at 08:24:45, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>A question for you Rolf >>If you say that every result should be taken with a grain of salt > >Thanks for the question, but I think it was clear that it was mainly Ed Schroder >who told me so. So, what I was doing, I quoted it what Ed had said. I have a >different opinion about results. Either they are statistically interesting or >they are not. > >The reason why I discussed Thorsten's results was the context. He had said that >he was creating a style. Then he played some games to see if the style was >stronger than the default. Thorsten claimed that the style was stronger since >the games showed it. What I did then was showing that theses games against >Shredder did not prove a better strength. > >Please leave out fecal vocabulary. What I did had nothing to do with - >"pissing". But perhaps I have overseen something. > >The reason why I do not debate about the results of others here is simply that I >never saw such contradictions in the presentation and most results resp. games I >download and store them without even playing them. It's also a question of time. >Hope this helps. > >Rolf Tueschen Keeping on with a sencles discusion is also a form of pissing at someone (Believe me) If I would do this with everyone i have some disagreements with there was no space left to post sencefull mesages. For instance I could go one with do you think that you'r in the position which words I use? Ok i did but this was ment to give you an example. Talking about statistics look at Kasparov versus Kramnik and look what you oncc could find on this page Knowing they both had knew the same analyses I think that would be more intresting if you want to talk about statistics. I also have some Rebel personeltys on my computer who have some good results but I am not satesfied with them. Hehe I simply blaim it on the main engine like some socerers do with the ball. Though i think i am more close to the treuth then they are. >>Why do you make such along discusion about it? >>And why only against Thorsten? >>This looks to me as a personal attack in the first place. >>If the person your pissing at becomes angry you don't know why. >>Maybe you find it normal that people accept this? >>Even if Thorsten would not have given honest results but he enjoys it let him. >>I also came to the conclusion you get pissed at a lot if you realy have >>something to say here. >>So might it be so you are jalous? >>And again if not why are you making such a long discusion about it?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.