Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 02:39:55 09/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2002 at 18:02:02, Marc van Hal wrote: > Keeping on with a sencles discusion is also a form of pissing at someone Marc, you are a great thinker (perhaps CTF could also please you) but the interesting word here is senseless, ok? Are you the one who is defining what is with sense or without? I would agree with you that _if_ it were senseless that then your verdict could be true. But your verdict is only true if the verdict "senseless" is true. And in this case it isn't. >(Believe me) That is not the best argument you should give. >If I would do this with everyone i have some disagreements with NB please that this is a clear allegation with no proof up to now! You are insinuating that I have some quarrel with someone nd _then_ begin to talk about chess games? If you really meant it then please stop such nonsense. It's insulting. > there was no >space left to post sencefull mesages. >For instance I could go one with do you think that you'r in the position which >words I use? Funny. The answer is no, as far as I am concerned. Now what is wih you? >Ok i did but this was ment to give you an example. Here it was an example but above it was your attitude. +smile+ >Talking about statistics look at Kasparov versus Kramnik and look what you oncc >could find on this page Knowing they both had knew the same analyses >I think that would be more intresting if you want to talk about statistics. But you are sure that you know that this is a page about computer chess? ;) > >I also have some Rebel personeltys on my computer who have some good results but >I am not satesfied with them. >Hehe I simply blaim it on the main engine like some socerers do with the ball. >Though i think i am more close to the treuth then they are. WERE ARE THE GAMES???????????????????? :) Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.