Author: Severi Salminen
Date: 05:07:44 09/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
>If that's in fact the de facto standard I'd be inclined to switch. >I don't know if that's the case, though (no offense), as I haven't >looked at anybody else's source in quite a while. (Not that there's >anything wrong with that.) > >Are you sure your definition is "standard"? Well, it is the most logical way if you think of it. Maybe a year ago I also had a different scheme (qnodes++ at the beginning of qsearch()) and back then everyone was doing different. So "my" definition is at least closer to the truth :) If you implement it, just make sure where to inc nodes and where qnodes so you won't get any overlapping. Severi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.