Author: Simon Finn
Date: 08:40:32 09/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2002 at 19:03:03, john rice wrote: >Not sure what you mean. Remember, I am running Fritz 7 and 64M hash. Also, I am >very highly overclocked with a very high front side bus speed which helps >performance greatly. I think he means that for a *Fritz6* fritzmark, "the kn/s figure is numerically smaller than the fritz mark" e.g. 1780KN/s (Fritz6) gives a fritzmark of 1233. So he's surprised by fritzmark figures where this isn't the case. Fritz7 (other than the no-MMX version) does fewer nodes per second on the same hardware than Fritz6 does. That doesn't mean that it solves the fritzmark test set any slower. So for a *Fritz7* fritzmark, it's quite reasonable that "only" 1128kN/s (Fritz7) is equivalent to a fritzmark of 1602. The fritzmark ratings correspond to the time-to-solution (5.0s vs 6.7s), at least to first approximation. Simon > >On September 18, 2002 at 12:59:47, Rajen Gupta wrote: > >>On September 17, 2002 at 21:37:26, john rice wrote: >> >>>I don't have Fritz6 anymore, but here's what I get with Fritz 7 and 64m hash >>>with an overclocked amd xp2200+ @2.01Ghz running a 400mhz fsb!: >>> >>>1602(5.0s) >>>1128kN/s >>> >>>On September 16, 2002 at 15:48:56, Terje Vagle wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>I have just upgraded my PC. >>>> >>>>Fritzmark on P4-2,8GHz with hash 32 MB running on Win XP >>>> >>>>1233 ( 6,7 s ) >>>> >>>>1780KN/s >> >>there is something wrong in this score. as i am away from my pc i cannot check >>the values and i cannot remember the figures on my computer, but i am quite >>certain that the kn/s figure is numerically smaller than the fritz mark. >> >>rajen >>>> >>>>How is this compared to the fast Athlon's out there? >>>> >>>>Thanks. >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>> >>>>Terje Vagle
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.