Author: Heiner Marxen
Date: 10:43:22 09/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2002 at 17:01:30, F. Huber wrote: >On September 18, 2002 at 13:56:21, Heiner Marxen wrote: > >>On September 18, 2002 at 13:17:26, F. Huber wrote: >> >>>On September 18, 2002 at 01:12:15, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>I have tested UCI version and found, that program is unbelievable fast. I have >>>>tested some EGTB positions to verify solution with Nalimov's! And they were >>>>same. >>>>But one question: is it possible to see any info about search depth and/or node >>>>speed? Or should I only wait may be hours before anything is displayed? >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>Hi Jouni, >>> >>>that´s really one problem, I´m also not very happy about with my ChestUCI. >>>But the original ´Chest´ does NOT output ANY informations while thinking, >>>and so also my UCI-interface has absolutely no chance to inform the GUI about >>>the progress of the searching :-( >>> >>>If you really have no idea of ´how many moves to mate´, maybe it could help >>>to start with a moderate number of ´SearchDepth´ (e.g. 5, 6,...) and increase >>>this number by one whenever no mate has been found. So you could at least >>>get ´some´ idea, how long the next calculation step would need. >>> >>>Maybe in the next version Heiner Marxen will implement ´some´ output info >>>while thinking - at least the actual search depth would IMO not slow down >>>the reallly fantastic seach speed. >> >>I'm listening... "I'll do my very best". >> >>Unfortunately, the next version of Chest is delayed, but there is some chance, >>that I offer a slightly extended version 3.19b, better suitable for ChestUCI. >>I would announce that here, of course. >> >>Cheers, >>Heiner > >Hello Heiner, > >the modifications of your Chest which we discussed some weeks ago (option -5, >coordinate output, ...) I have already done in your source code - I believe >to remember, that you have no DOS or Windows system available (only Unix), yes >so you probably couldn´t test my new version of your Chest (I called it 3.19+). yes >I.e., my new Chest version is already almost optimal for my UCI interface, >but of course _you_ may have more (and better) ideas for adapting it to UCI. only what you told me, already, and the above mentioned output. >If so, I hope that it will not be necessary for me to completely rewrite >my whole engine ;-) >(It was rather a lot of work for me to program this interface at all) I'll email you when I have something to offer. >Best wishes, >Franz. Cheers, Heiner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.