Author: David Hanley
Date: 12:39:46 09/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 2002 at 14:17:16, Uri Blass wrote: >Is it shorter than tscp? > I had to download TSCP and look it over. It's pretty compact. It's actually a *little* shorter. It has fewer comments but longer function/variable names and more of 'em. It's written in lisp vs C, and my source is all in one file, so it's hard to compare exactly. TSCP has a more eval going on, but i have hash tables, separate pawn hash, history, nullmove, killers, lazy evaluation, static exchange eval in the move orderer and quiesce, etc, OTOH, i'm only getting about 10K NPS, but there's a lot i can do to speed it up--i do considerable allocation during search--but i want to get it on FICS and tweak the eval and search before i worry about that. >Does it play better than tscp? I downloaded tscp, and i think they play about the same.. But i could be way off. TSCP is a good deal faster, but seems to cover a lot more nodes to get to the same depth. I'd have to play them head to head to get a good idea of the relative strength... dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.