Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:53:54 09/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 2002 at 16:30:24, David Hanley wrote: >On September 19, 2002 at 16:05:22, Uri Blass wrote: > >>My guess based on the descreption that you gave is that tscp is better at short >>time control when your program is better at long time control. >> >>I think that tscp only make the illusion of knowledge but it does not know the >>important things so it is possible to have a simpler evaluation that has the >>same quality. > >My eval is really stupid, yet i'm surprised by how well the program does. Just >material + central control + harebrained king safety plays ok once you get a 8 >ply seach, but it needs a little more endgame smarts. The eval is definitely >where i need to do some work. I think that speed is the most important thing that can help you to improve your program. Doing your program more than 10 times faster is more important than everything that you can add to your evaluation in the near future. Tscp is not optimized for speed and if tscp is clearly faster than your program then it mean that you can get significant improvement by speed improvement. If you think about adding evaluation then my opinion is that mobility is the most important thing to add. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.