Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:34:04 09/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 2002 at 14:34:48, Chris Carson wrote: >On September 19, 2002 at 14:17:50, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 19, 2002 at 14:05:58, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On September 19, 2002 at 14:03:25, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>If Hiarcs 8 can at least use the new AMD 2.6 Ghz or the upcoming 3.0 Ghz Intel >>>by January, it might have a chance to win. >>> >>>http://www.chessevents.nl/bareev_match.shtml >> >> >>Note that this is 40 moves in 2 hours. >> >>The computer is going to have its "hands" full with this GM. Or any >>GM. At that time control. > >At 40/2 on AMD 2.6 or PIV 3.0, the advantage is to the comp. The GM may win, >but Hiarcs 8.0 is the favorite in this match. > >This is great news, my best to both the GM and Hiarcs. I totally disagree. The longer the time control, the better the human will do. Based on watching these games about 30 years now. IE at correspondence, a good IM will tear the chips out of most any program going... At blitz, the comp is nearly unbeatable... _nearly_ being the operative word of course. Hiarcs might be the favorite for you, but my instinct says "human". At game/30 the comp would definitely be favored. At game/60 it gets tougher. At a non- sudden-death time control, the human isn't going to get into time trouble and get blitzed...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.