Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:20:56 09/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 20, 2002 at 18:18:07, John Merlino wrote: >On September 20, 2002 at 18:00:48, Tony Werten wrote: > >>On September 20, 2002 at 16:45:28, John Merlino wrote: >> >>>On September 20, 2002 at 16:37:38, Will Singleton wrote: >>> >>>>On September 20, 2002 at 16:23:53, John Merlino wrote: >>>> >>>>>>1:52 13/17 -1.54 11346643 1...Ba4 2.Bd1 Kd3 3.e5 Kd2 4.Bf3 >>>>>> Kc2 5.e6 Kxb2 6.Kg4 Kc1 7.Be4 b2 >>>>>> 8.Kh4 Bc6 9.Bd3 b1=Q 10.Bxb1 Kxb1 >>>>>>3:58 14/18 -1.56 23785267 1...Ba4 2.Bd1 Kd3 3.e5 Kd2 4.Bf3 >>>>>> Kc2 5.e6 Kxb2 6.Kg3 Kc1 7.Be4 b2 >>>>>> 8.Kh4 Bc6 9.Bd3 b1=Q 10.Bxb1 Kxb1 >>>>>> 11.Kg4 >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>Here's what my wonderful new P4-2.66 says: >>>>> >>>>>0:24 13/17 -1.56 9124305 1...Ba4 2.Bd1 Kd3 3.e5 Kd2 4.Bf3 >>>>> Kc2 5.Be4+ Kxb2 6.e6 Kc1 7.Kg4 >>>>> b2 8.Kh4 Bc6 9.Bd3 b1=Q 10.Bxb1 >>>>> Kxb1 11.Kg4 >>>>>0:42 14/18 -1.56 16053836 1...Ba4 2.Bd1 Kd3 3.e5 Kd2 4.Bf3 >>>>> Kc2 5.e6 Kxb2 6.Kg3 Kc1 7.Be4 b2 >>>>> 8.Kh4 Bc6 9.Bd3 b1=Q 10.Bxb1 Kxb1 >>>>> 11.Kg4 >>>> >>>>Why are the node counts different? >>> >>>Because I'm stupid.... Well, not exactly -- let's just say I confused myself. >>> >>>We are working on a French version of Chessmaster, so I re-installed the program >>>and the user that I logged in as was using the default of 4MB hash table size >>>for the PIII-600 version, instead of the 32MB I used for the P4-2.66 version. >>>Here is what the PIII-600 says with 32MB of hash (same node count, but >>>noticeably faster than the 2MB version): >>> >> >>I'm sorry, did you just say CM got faster from more hashtable ? >> >>I'm confused now. >> >>Tony > >Yes, I did. Why are you confused? Maybe he was thinking of NPS (which usually goes down) instead of time to solution, which normally speeds up with more hash.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.