Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:25:20 09/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 20, 2002 at 18:03:55, Tony Werten wrote: >On September 20, 2002 at 05:15:45, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>[D]2b1q3/p7/1p1p2kb/nPpN3p/P1P1P2P/6P1/5R1K/5Q2 w - - 0 1 >> >>Isn't Rf6+ an alternate solution to e5? > >I think it is. I spoke with several other programmer about this position. Most >seem to play Rf6. Both seem to be good ( +1.5 ) It looks to me like a simple transposition. The programs that play Rf6 will play e5 in a few plies, and end up at the same position.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.