Author: Tony Werten
Date: 02:15:37 09/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2002 at 05:14:20, Tony Werten wrote: >On September 21, 2002 at 05:11:37, Tony Werten wrote: > >>On September 20, 2002 at 18:25:20, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On September 20, 2002 at 18:03:55, Tony Werten wrote: >>> >>>>On September 20, 2002 at 05:15:45, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>>> >>>>>[D]2b1q3/p7/1p1p2kb/nPpN3p/P1P1P2P/6P1/5R1K/5Q2 w - - 0 1 >>>>> >>>>>Isn't Rf6+ an alternate solution to e5? >>>> >>>>I think it is. I spoke with several other programmer about this position. Most >>>>seem to play Rf6. Both seem to be good ( +1.5 ) >>> >>>It looks to me like a simple transposition. >>>The programs that play Rf6 will play e5 in a few plies, and end up at the same >>>position. >> >>Could be. I'm not sure though. It would explain why most programs choose Rf6 >>since this gets an extension in most programs and e5 appears to be loosing a >>pawn. Later they get the same score so e5 will never replace Rf6. >> >>BTW Are there any programs that solve this one ? ( Don't mean matesolvers ) >> > [D]rnb1k1nr/p2p1ppp/3B4/1p1N1N1P/4P1P1/3P1Q2/PqP5/R4Kb1 w kq - 0 1 > >>Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.