Author: Chessfun
Date: 11:58:11 09/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2002 at 10:59:04, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On September 21, 2002 at 10:30:10, Peter Skinner wrote: > >[snip] > >>I have a sinking feeling here that I am _not_ going to be the one that is >>going to look foolish. > >Being sceptic about something because one doesn't have enough information and >later see the proof it _is_ a new engine doesn't make you look foolish. (that's >how science works by the way) Pretending to know something for sure (like that >someone's cheating) without evidence and later be proven wrong does. > >Bob won't look foolish, however the Ruffian story turns out. You on the other >hand might. You're right Dr. Hyatt won't look foolish regardless how it turns out. I'm also not so sure Peter will, he wrote what I believe many think and have implied. He though had more courage then many by stating it exactly. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.