Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: "I hope the GM doesnt get the program before the match", means >

Author: Joachim Rang

Date: 12:30:35 09/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On September 21, 2002 at 13:39:17, Uri Blass wrote:

>On September 21, 2002 at 13:00:05, K. Burcham wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>when I first learned that this statement is used and accepted often, I had to
>>laugh.
>>when anyone makes this statement, they are admitting that programs have enough
>>problems that if a GM has the program before the match, that these problems can
>>be discovered, and used during the match to play for the win.
>>I find this amusing.
>
>The interesting match is when humans do not get a copy.
>I could understand giving humans a copy if computers proved themselves to be
>superior in normal conditions but computers still need to prove that they are
>superior in normal conditions.
>
>I can add that the only way to beat humans who get a copy before the match is by
>some non deterministic behaviour otherwise the human can  learn the right games
>before the match and the right games can be even games of the program against
>itself.
>
>Uri
>
>

this would mean, that one should be able to repeat "killergames" in an official
match. Due to a big opening book and the right for the computerteam to choose
the first move, this won't happen.


>
>
>
>
>>I would give Kramnik 25 copies of the program on the hardware that will be used
>>during the match. Then let Kramnik play to what he thinks he has discovered is
>>the program's weakness. Then the programmer can go back and try to improve the
>>program.
>>"I have weaknesses in my program that in the last ten years I have not been able
>>to improve on". "So I would like to fool everyone in believing that my program
>>can beat the GM by not letting him play my program before the match".
>>
>>I think everyone here understands why some say this. I just think that those who
>>have been taught to think this is the way it should be,are incorrect.
>>
>>In early developement stages in 70's, 80's, etc., I can understand why some
>>would say this, many blunders and mistakes back then. Sometime we will see the
>>day that these people will not say this anymore. Maybe too early to expect this
>>for now.
>>
>>kburcham



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.